AI evals resources for product teams.
Practical guides, original benchmarks, and comparison research for testing AI features, building evals, and validating LLM judges before deployment.

Mental health AI: An expert rubric does not make a trustworthy judge

The AI cost trap
How to build an AI evaluation rubric from real outputs

The ultimate guide to building an LLM judge you can trust

The best platform to build an LLM judge in 2026

The battle of the LLM judges: Which LLM judge can you trust with your AI product's quality?
Explore by topic
LLM-as-a-judge
Build, validate and select an LLM judge — grounded in original benchmarks against human labels.
Explore all articles →02AI evaluation tools compared
Head-to-head reviews of the evaluation platforms product teams actually use — Braintrust, Langfuse, PostHog, Confident AI and more.
Explore all articles →03AI Product building
Ready to build your first AI product? Or already on it? This is for you.
Explore all articles →
AI evals for product managers: the complete guide for 2026

Best AI evaluation tools for product managers in 2026 (ranked by a PM)

Langfuse vs PostHog vs openevals: the judge templates compared

Why ship and learn just does not work for AI features

The death of the prompt box: what A16Z's 2026 prediction means for your AI features

Lessons from one year of AI product building

The expert test: how to identify high-value AI features for your product

Braintrust vs Lovelaice: which AI evaluation platform fits your team in 2026

How to move past vibe checks: scaling manual AI testing into systematic evaluation

The alternative to Confident AI for product teams (2026)

The alternative to Langfuse for product teams (2026)

What document extraction actually costs across 15 models
Glossary
Defined terms from our methodology
The vocabulary we use to talk about AI evaluation, with sources and attribution.
The Evaluation Ladder
TermA six-step methodology for AI evaluation where teams earn each step before automating, ending with deterministic checks and a surgical, validated LLM-as-judge built on documented failure patterns.
AI feature vs. AI product
FramingAn AI feature is one capability inside a product that already does a job. An AI product is the whole thing built around the model. The distinction decides what a mediocre model output actually costs — being ignored, or eroding trust in the surrounding product.
Productivity use vs. AI at scale
FramingProductivity use is you using an LLM to move faster in your own work, where a human reads every output. AI at scale is the same model running inside your product thousands of times a day with nobody checking. The techniques that work for one break silently in the other.
Ship and hope
TermThe pattern of deploying AI features based on a handful of happy-path demos, without systematic validation, and hoping production matches the demo. The default mode for most teams shipping their first AI feature.
Ship AI products that actually work
The email course that takes you from first idea to validated AI — no data science team required.